Sheaves that fail to represent matrix rings
Manuel L. Reyes

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates fundamental obstructions to representing noncommutative rings as sheaves, showing that certain natural sheaf-theoretic constructions cannot exist even when restricted to matrix rings.
Contribution
It proves two no-go theorems showing the impossibility of representing noncommutative rings via sheaves with properties analogous to the commutative case.
Findings
No subcanonical coverage includes all Zariski covers for rings.
No functor from rings to ringed categories can extend the spectrum functor to noncommutative rings.
Abstract
There are two fundamental obstructions to representing noncommutative rings via sheaves. First, there is no subcanonical coverage on the opposite of the category of rings that includes all covering families in the big Zariski site. Second, there is no contravariant functor F from the category of rings to the category of ringed categories whose composite with the global sections functor is naturally isomorphic to the identity, such that F restricts to the Zariski spectrum functor Spec on the category of commutative rings (in a compatible way with the natural isomorphism). Both of these no-go results are proved by restricting attention to matrix rings.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
