On the Unavoidability of the Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics
Roberto Beneduci, Franklin E. Schroeck Jr

TL;DR
This paper emphasizes the importance of clearly defining 'interpretation' in quantum mechanics discussions to prevent misunderstandings and facilitate more precise debates on the subject.
Contribution
It provides a clarification of the term 'interpretation' in quantum mechanics, addressing a key weak point in the ongoing debates.
Findings
Highlights the lack of a clear definition of 'interpretation' in quantum mechanics discussions
Argues that clarifying 'interpretation' is essential for meaningful debate
Calls for precise terminology to improve understanding in the field
Abstract
Recently, the presence in the literature (also recent) of voluminous discussions about the interpretation of quantum mechanics has been labelled as scandalous. We claim that a weak point of the debate which hosted such a conclusion is a lack of a definition of the term "interpretation". In the present note, we would "like to make precise" that meaning and to show how such a clarification is necessary in order to avoid misunderstandings.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Philosophy and History of Science
