Is the Measurement Based Quantum Computing Search Algorithm Really Grover's Algorithm?
A. Matthew Smith, P. M. Alsing, J. R. McDonald, D.B. Uskov

TL;DR
This paper critically examines whether the measurement-based quantum computing search algorithm is truly Grover's algorithm, highlighting fundamental differences especially in larger search spaces, despite superficial similarities in small cases.
Contribution
The study provides a detailed comparison of measurement-based quantum search and Grover's algorithm, revealing key operational differences beyond trivial cases.
Findings
Significant differences in oracle tag behavior
Distinct entanglement dynamics between the algorithms
Fundamental divergence in larger search spaces
Abstract
We question whether the measurement based quantum computing algorithm is in fact Grover's algorithm or simply a similar oracular search method. The two algorithms share several qualitative features especially in the case of the trivial 4 element search, which is the largest size photonic search algorithm that has been experimentally implemented to date. This has led some to refer to both substantiations as Grover's algorithm. We compare multiple features of the two algorithms including the behavior of the oracle tags and the entanglement dynamics, both qualitatively and quantitatively. We find significant and fundamental differences in the operation of the two algorithms, particularly in cases involving searches on more than four elements.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Information and Cryptography · Quantum Mechanics and Applications · Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
