The Most Metal-Poor Stars. IV. The Two Populations With [Fe/H] < -3.0
John E. Norris, David Yong, M. S. Bessell, N. Christlieb, M. Asplund,, Gerard Gilmore, Rosemary F.G. Wyse, Timothy C. Beers, P. S. Barklem, Anna, Frebel, S. G. Ryan

TL;DR
This study analyzes the chemical compositions of extremely metal-poor Galactic halo stars, identifying two populations distinguished by carbon content and proposing different early Universe cooling mechanisms as their origin.
Contribution
It provides a detailed chemical abundance analysis of stars with [Fe/H] < -3.0, revealing two distinct populations and suggesting different formation pathways in the early Universe.
Findings
C-rich stars constitute ~28% of stars below [Fe/H] = -3.1.
C-rich stars are O-rich and show enhanced Na, Mg, Al.
Limited radial velocity data do not strongly support binarity as a key factor.
Abstract
We discuss the carbon-normal and carbon-rich populations of Galactic halo stars having [Fe/H] < -3.0, utilizing chemical abundances from high-resolution, high-S/N model-atmosphere analyses. The C-rich population represents ~28% of stars below [Fe/H] = -3.1, with the present C-rich sample comprising 16 CEMP-no stars, and two others with [Fe/H] ~ -5.5 and uncertain classification. The population is O-rich ([O/Fe] > +1.5); the light elements Na, Mg, and Al are enhanced relative to Fe in half the sample; and for Z > 20 (Ca) there is little evidence for enhancements relative to solar values. These results are best explained in terms of the admixing and processing of material from H-burning and He-burning regions as achieved by nucleosynthesis in zero-heavy-element models in the literature of "mixing and fallback" supernovae (SNe); of rotating, massive and intermediate mass stars; and of Type…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
