The 2011 Outburst of Recurrent Nova T Pyx: Radio Observations Reveal the Ejecta Mass and Hint at Complex Mass Loss
Thomas Nelson, Laura Chomiuk, Nirupam Roy, J. L. Sokoloski, Koji, Mukai, Miriam I. Krauss, Amy J. Mioduszewski, Michael P. Rupen, and Jennifer, Weston

TL;DR
Radio observations of T Pyx's 2011 outburst reveal a surprisingly high ejecta mass and complex mass loss behavior, challenging typical recurrent nova models and suggesting a white dwarf below the Chandrasekhar limit.
Contribution
This study provides the first detailed radio analysis of T Pyx's outburst, estimating an unusually large ejecta mass and indicating complex mass loss processes.
Findings
Ejecta mass estimated at 1-30 x 10^{-5} solar masses.
Radio emission onset was delayed, implying cold or slowly expanding ejecta initially.
Ejecta mass exceeds typical recurrent nova values, suggesting a sub-Chandrasekhar white dwarf.
Abstract
Despite being the prototype of its class, T Pyx is arguably the most unusual and poorly understood recurrent nova. Here, we use radio observations from the Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array to trace the evolution of the ejecta over the course of the 2011 outburst of T Pyx. The radio emission is broadly consistent with thermal emission from the nova ejecta. However, the radio flux began rising surprisingly late in the outburst, indicating that the bulk of the radio-emitting material was either very cold, or expanding very slowly, for the first ~50 days of the outburst. Considering a plausible range of volume filling factors and geometries for the ejecta, we find that the high peak flux densities of the radio emission require a massive ejection of 1-30 x 10^{-5} solar masses. This ejecta mass is much higher than the values normally associated with recurrent novae, and is more consistent…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
