Photometric Constraints on the Redshift of z~10 candidate UDFj-39546284 from deeper WFC3/IR+ACS+IRAC observations over the HUDF
R. J. Bouwens (Leiden), P. A. Oesch (UCSC), G. D. Illingworth (UCSC),, I. Labbe (Leiden), P. G. van Dokkum (Yale), G. Brammer (ESO, Santiago), D., Magee (UCSC), L. Spitler (Macquarie), M. Franx (Leiden), R. Smit (Leiden), M., Trenti (Cambridge), V. Gonzalez (UCR)

TL;DR
Deep observations of a z~10 galaxy candidate suggest it is likely at a higher redshift around 12, with evidence pointing towards line emission influencing its detection, challenging previous lower-redshift interpretations.
Contribution
This study provides the first detailed photometric analysis with deeper WFC3/IR data, refining the redshift estimate of a key z~10 candidate and exploring alternative explanations involving line emission.
Findings
Candidate is confirmed as a real source with increased significance.
Best-fit redshift is approximately 11.8, but z~12 is unlikely due to luminosity and emission constraints.
Line emission may explain the observed flux, indicating complex high-redshift galaxy properties.
Abstract
Ultra-deep WFC3/IR observations on the HUDF from the HUDF09 program revealed just one plausible z~10 candidate UDFj-39546284. UDFj-39546284 had all the properties expected of a galaxy at z~10 showing (1) no detection in the deep ACS+WFC3 imaging data blueward of the F160W band, exhibiting (2) a blue spectral slope redward of the break, and showing (3) no prominent detection in deep IRAC observations. The new, similarly deep WFC3/IR HUDF12 F160W observations over the HUDF09/XDF allow us to further assess this candidate. These observations show that this candidate, previously only detected at ~5.9 sigma in a single band, clearly corresponds to a real source. It is detected at ~5.3 sigma in the new H-band data and at ~7.8 sigma in the full 85-orbit H-band stack. Interestingly, the non-detection of the source (<1 sigma) in the new F140W observations suggests a higher redshift. Formally, the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
