A reflexive Banach space whose algebra of operators is not a Grothendieck space
Tomasz Kania

TL;DR
This paper constructs a reflexive Banach space whose algebra of bounded operators is not a Grothendieck space, providing a counterexample to a longstanding open problem in functional analysis.
Contribution
It identifies a specific reflexive Banach space with an operator algebra that is not Grothendieck, answering a question posed by Diestel and Uhl.
Findings
The space of operators on the constructed reflexive space is not Grothendieck.
A complemented subspace of operators contains a copy of .
Counterexample to the assumption that operator spaces on reflexive spaces are Grothendieck.
Abstract
By a result of Johnson, the Banach space contains a complemented copy of . We identify with a complemented subspace of the space of (bounded, linear) operators on the reflexive space (, thus giving a negative answer to the problem posed in the monograph of Diestel and Uhl which asks whether the space of operators on a reflexive Banach space is Grothendieck.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
