Excitations of amorphous solid helium
Jacques Bossy, Jacques Ollivier, Helmut Schober, Henry R. Glyde

TL;DR
This study uses neutron scattering to compare the dynamic structure factor of amorphous solid helium in nanopores with bulk solid helium, finding no evidence of superflow or unique amorphous modes, and observing melting behavior at higher temperatures.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed comparison of $S(Q,)$ between amorphous and polycrystalline solid helium confined in nanopores, highlighting their similarities and the absence of superfluid signatures.
Findings
No superflow or unique amorphous modes detected.
Amorphous and polycrystalline solids show similar $S(Q,)$.
Solid helium melts to a normal liquid with characteristic broad $S(Q,)$ at higher temperatures.
Abstract
We present neutron scattering measurements of the dynamic structure factor, , of amorphous solid helium confined in 47 pore diameter MCM-41 at pressure 48.6 bar. At low temperature, = 0.05 K, we observe of the confined quantum amorphous solid plus the bulk polycrystalline solid between the MCM-41 powder grains. No liquid-like phonon-roton modes, other sharply defined modes at low energy ( 1.0 meV) or modes unique to a quantum amorphous solid that might suggest superflow are observed. Rather the of confined amorphous and bulk polycrystalline solid appear to be very similar. At higher temperature ( 1 K), the amorphous solid in the MCM-41 pores melts to a liquid which has a broad peaked near 0 characteristic of normal liquid He under pressure. Expressions for the of amorphous and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum, superfluid, helium dynamics · High-pressure geophysics and materials · Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics
