On the Origin of the Quantum Rules for Identical Particles
Klil H. Neori, Philip Goyal

TL;DR
This paper provides a proof of the Symmetrization Postulate for noninteracting identical particles within the Feynman formalism, clarifying the foundational assumptions and improving upon previous derivations.
Contribution
It offers a clearer, more rigorous proof of the Symmetrization Postulate, avoiding strong assumptions and building on operational quantum mechanics principles.
Findings
Proof applies to noninteracting, identical particles
Improves upon Tikochinsky's derivation by clarifying assumptions
Avoids strong, abstract assumptions like analyticity
Abstract
We present a proof of the Symmetrization Postulate for the special case of noninteracting, identical particles. The proof is given in the context of the Feynman formalism of Quantum Mechanics, and builds upon the work of Goyal, Knuth and Skilling (Phys. Rev. A 81, 022109 (2010)), which shows how to derive Feynman's rules from operational assumptions concerning experiments. Our proof is inspired by an attempt to derive this result due to Tikochinsky (Phys. Rev. A 37, 3553 (1988)), but substantially improves upon his argument, by clarifying the nature of the subject matter, by improving notation, and by avoiding strong, abstract assumptions such as analyticity.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
