The role of gender in scholarly authorship
Jevin D. West, Jennifer Jacquet, Molly M. King, Shelley J. Correll,, Carl T. Bergstrom

TL;DR
Despite apparent progress, gender disparities in academia persist subtly, with men dominating prestigious authorship positions and women underrepresented in single-authored papers across various fields, as shown by large-scale analysis.
Contribution
This study provides a comprehensive large-scale analysis revealing persistent and subtle gender disparities in scholarly authorship across multiple disciplines.
Findings
Men dominate first and last author positions in some fields.
Women are underrepresented as single-authors.
Gender disparities remain despite overall progress.
Abstract
Gender disparities appear to be decreasing in academia according to a number of metrics, such as grant funding, hiring, acceptance at scholarly journals, and productivity, and it might be tempting to think that gender inequity will soon be a problem of the past. However, a large-scale analysis based on over eight million papers across the natural sciences, social sciences, and humanities re- reveals a number of understated and persistent ways in which gender inequities remain. For instance, even where raw publication counts seem to be equal between genders, close inspection reveals that, in certain fields, men predominate in the prestigious first and last author positions. Moreover, women are significantly underrepresented as authors of single-authored papers. Academics should be aware of the subtle ways that gender disparities can appear in scholarly authorship.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGender Diversity and Inequality · scientometrics and bibliometrics research · Diversity and Career in Medicine
