Delayed choice without choice
M. Dugic
TL;DR
This paper critically examines modern interpretations of the delayed choice experiment, arguing that many proposals and evidence misinterpret the original concept, thus preserving the integrity of the Complementarity principle.
Contribution
It provides a critical analysis showing that recent proposals and experiments misinterpret the delayed choice concept, reaffirming the principle of complementarity.
Findings
Many modern proposals are incorrectly understood or interpreted.
The original idea of the delayed choice experiment remains valid.
Complementarity principle remains intact despite recent claims.
Abstract
A critical note on some of the existing proposals for performing the "delayed choice" experiment is placed. By abandoning the original idea and intention, some modern theoretical proposals and experimental evidence are simply incorrectly understood/interpreted. In effect, the Complementarity principle remains practically intact.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Philosophy and History of Science