Funded Bilateral Valuation Adjustment
Lorenzo Giada, Claudio Nordio

TL;DR
This paper introduces the Funded Bilateral Valuation Adjustment (FBVA), linking funding costs of collateral to counterparty risk, and suggests it as a method to restructure and potentially reduce capital charges in uncollateralized transactions.
Contribution
It defines the FBVA concept, connecting funding costs with bilateral default probabilities, and proposes it as a tool for risk restructuring under Basel III regulations.
Findings
FBVA aligns funding costs with bilateral default risk.
It offers a way to mitigate Basel III capital charges.
The approach provides a new perspective on counterparty risk management.
Abstract
We show how the cost of funding the collateral in a particular set up can be equal to the Bilateral Valuation Adjustment with the "funded" probability of default, leading to the definition of a Funded Bilateral Valuation Adjustment (FBVA). That set up can also be viewed by an investor as an effective way to restructure the counterparty risk arising from an uncollateralized transaction with a counterparty, mitigating or even avoiding entirely the additional capital charge introduced by the new Basel III framework.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCredit Risk and Financial Regulations · Banking stability, regulation, efficiency · Insurance and Financial Risk Management
