Implication of Higgs at 125 GeV within Stochastic Superspace Framework

TL;DR

This paper explores how stochasticity in superspace can naturally generate soft SUSY breaking terms, and demonstrates that with a nonzero scalar mass term, the Higgs at 125 GeV can be achieved within this framework, aligning with experimental constraints.

Contribution

It shows that incorporating a nonvanishing scalar mass term in stochastic superspace models allows for the correct Higgs mass and experimental consistency, extending previous analyses that used higher unification scales.

Findings

Achieves Higgs mass of 125 GeV within stochastic SUSY framework.

Requires a nonzero scalar mass soft term similar to AMSB.

Aligns with LHC, dark matter, flavor physics, and XENON100 constraints.

Abstract

We revisit the issue of considering stochasticity of Grassmannian coordinates in N=1 superspace, which was analyzed previously by Kobakhidze {\it et al}. In this stochastic supersymmetry(SUSY) framework, the soft SUSY breaking terms of the minimal supersymmetric Standard Model(MSSM) such as the bilinear Higgs mixing, trilinear coupling as well as the gaugino mass parameters are all proportional to a single mass parameter \xi, a measure of supersymmetry breaking arising out of stochasticity. While a nonvanishing trilinear coupling at the high scale is a natural outcome of the framework, a favorable signature for obtaining the lighter Higgs boson mass $m_h$ at 125 GeV, the model produces tachyonic sleptons or staus turning to be too light. The previous analyses took $\Lambda$, the scale at which input parameters are given, to be larger than the gauge coupling unification scale $M_G$ in order to generate acceptable scalar masses radiatively at the electroweak scale. Still this was inadequate for obtaining $m_h$ at 125 GeV. We find that Higgs at 125 GeV is highly achievable provided we are ready to accommodate a nonvanishing scalar mass soft SUSY breaking term similar to what is done in minimal anomaly mediated SUSY breaking (AMSB) in contrast to a pure AMSB setup. Thus, the model can easily accommodate Higgs data, LHC limits of squark masses, WMAP data for dark matter relic density, flavor physics constraints and XENON100 data. In contrast to the previous analyses we consider $\Lambda=M_G$, thus avoiding any ambiguities of a post-grand unified theory physics. The idea of stochastic superspace can easily be generalized to various scenarios beyond the MSSM . PACS Nos: 12.60.Jv, 04.65.+e, 95.30.Cq, 95.35.+d