Fixing the U-band photometry of Type Ia supernovae
Kevin Krisciunas, Deepak Bastola, Juan Espinoza, David Gonzalez, Luis, Gonzalez, Sergio Gonzalez, Mario Hamuy, Eric Y. Hsiao, Nidia Morrell, Mark M., Phillips, and Nicholas B. Suntzeff

TL;DR
This paper improves U-band photometry of Type Ia supernovae using spectroscopic corrections, reducing discrepancies and enabling better use of ultraviolet data for cosmological distance measurements.
Contribution
It introduces spectroscopically-derived corrections for U-band photometry, reconciling light curves from different telescopes and addressing the U-band anomaly in supernova cosmology.
Findings
Reduced the 0.4 mag spread in U-band light curves
Identified a 0.12 mag U-band anomaly affecting distance moduli
Enabled more accurate utilization of U-band data at redshift 0.3-0.8
Abstract
We present previously unpublished photometry of supernovae 2003gs and 2003hv. Using spectroscopically-derived corrections to the U-band photometry, we reconcile U-band light curves made from imagery with the Cerro Tololo 0.9-m, 1.3-m and Las Campanas 1-m telescopes. Previously, such light curves showed a 0.4 mag spread at one month after maximum light. This gives us hope that a set of corrected ultraviolet light curves of nearby objects can contribute to the full utilization of rest frame U-band data of supernovae at redshift ~0.3 to 0.8. As pointed out recently by Kessler et al. in the context of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey supernova search, if we take the published U-band photometry of nearby Type Ia supernovae at face value, there is a 0.12 mag U-band anomaly in the distance moduli of higher redshift objects. This anomaly led the Sloan survey to eliminate from their analyses all…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
