Contraction of areas vs. topology of mappings
Larry Guth

TL;DR
This paper investigates the relationship between the topological properties of maps between spheres and their geometric dilation, establishing bounds on how small the dilation can be for non-trivial maps.
Contribution
It constructs explicit examples of non-trivial maps with small dilation and proves lower bounds on dilation for such maps, linking topology and geometric distortion.
Findings
Explicit construction of non-trivial maps with arbitrarily small k-dilation for k > (m+1)/2
Proof that non-trivial maps cannot have arbitrarily small dilation for k ≤ (m+1)/2
Establishes a threshold relating topology and geometric distortion in sphere mappings
Abstract
We construct homotopically non-trivial maps from the unit m-sphere to the unit (m-1)-sphere with arbitrarily small k-dilation for each k greater than (m + 1)/2. We prove that homotopically non-trivial maps from the unit m-sphere to the unit (m-1)-sphere cannot have arbitrarily small k-dilation for k less than or equal to (m + 1)/2.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHomotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology · Advanced Topology and Set Theory · Geometric and Algebraic Topology
