
TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that bisimilarity for countable labelled transition systems is highly complex, not Borel, and cannot be characterized by a countable logic with measurable semantics, impacting probabilistic and nondeterministic process theory.
Contribution
It proves bisimilarity is $ ext{Σ}_1^1$-complete, showing it is not Borel, and establishes the non-existence of a suitable countable logic for image-infinite processes.
Findings
Bisimilarity is $ ext{Σ}_1^1$-complete and not Borel.
Logical characterizations of bisimilarity require non-measurable formulas.
No countable logic with measurable semantics exists for image-infinite processes.
Abstract
We prove that the relation of bisimilarity between countable labelled transition systems is -complete (hence not Borel), by reducing the set of non-wellorders over the natural numbers continuously to it. This has an impact on the theory of probabilistic and nondeterministic processes over uncountable spaces, since logical characterizations of bisimilarity (as, for instance, those based on the unique structure theorem for analytic spaces) require a countable logic whose formulas have measurable semantics. Our reduction shows that such a logic does not exist in the case of image-infinite processes.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
