Phase Retrieval: Stability and Recovery Guarantees

TL;DR

This paper investigates the conditions for stable and unique recovery of signals from noisy quadratic measurements in phase retrieval, providing measurement bounds based on the complexity of the input set.

Contribution

It introduces a general framework linking measurement requirements to set complexity, applicable to various input types including sparse and general vectors, with explicit bounds and stability guarantees.

Findings

O(k log(n/k)) measurements suffice for sparse signals

O(n) measurements suffice for general vectors

Error bounds improve with increased measurements and are independent of phase knowledge

Abstract

We consider stability and uniqueness in real phase retrieval problems over general input sets. Specifically, we assume the data consists of noisy quadratic measurements of an unknown input x in R^n that lies in a general set T and study conditions under which x can be stably recovered from the measurements. In the noise-free setting we derive a general expression on the number of measurements needed to ensure that a unique solution can be found in a stable way, that depends on the set T through a natural complexity parameter. This parameter can be computed explicitly for many sets T of interest. For example, for k-sparse inputs we show that O(k\log(n/k)) measurements are needed, and when x can be any vector in R^n, O(n) measurements suffice. In the noisy case, we show that if one can find a value for which the empirical risk is bounded by a given, computable constant (that depends on the set T), then the error with respect to the true input is bounded above by an another, closely related complexity parameter of the set. By choosing an appropriate number N of measurements, this bound can be made arbitrarily small, and it decays at a rate faster than N^{-1/2+\delta} for any \delta>0. In particular, for k-sparse vectors stable recovery is possible from O(k\log(n/k)\log k) noisy measurements, and when x can be any vector in R^n, O(n \log n) noisy measurements suffice. We also show that the complexity parameter for the quadratic problem is the same as the one used for analyzing stability in linear measurements under very general conditions. Thus, no substantial price has to be paid in terms of stability if there is no knowledge of the phase.