The role of the observer in the Everett interpretation
H. Dieter Zeh

TL;DR
This paper examines the observer's role in quantum mechanics, especially in the Everett interpretation, highlighting differences between quasi-classical and macroscopically given states and their implications for understanding measurement.
Contribution
It clarifies the observer's role in the Everett interpretation and distinguishes between quasi-classical and macroscopically given states in quantum theory.
Findings
Highlights the importance of decoherence in the Everett interpretation
Distinguishes between quasi-classical and macroscopically given states
Discusses implications for the role of the observer in quantum mechanics
Abstract
The role attributed to the observer in various interpretations of quantum mechanics as well as in classical statistical mechanics is discussed, with particular attention being paid to the Everett interpretation. In this context, the important difference between "quasi-classical" (robust against decoherence) and "macroscopically given" (rather than being part of a thermodynamic ensemble) is pointed out.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
