The McDonald-Kreitman Test and its Extensions under Frequent Adaptation: Problems and Solutions
Philipp W. Messer, Dmitri A. Petrov

TL;DR
This paper investigates how linkage effects and slightly deleterious mutations impact the accuracy of the McDonald-Kreitman test in estimating positive selection rates, proposing an asymptotic extension to improve its reliability.
Contribution
It identifies limitations of the MK test under realistic genomic scenarios and introduces a simple asymptotic extension to enhance its accuracy in the presence of linkage effects.
Findings
MK estimates underestimate true adaptation rate with deleterious mutations
Genetic draft distorts site frequency spectra at intermediate adaptation rates
Demography inference from synonymous sites can be misleading in simulations
Abstract
Population genomic studies have shown that genetic draft and background selection can profoundly affect the genome-wide patterns of molecular variation. We performed forward simulations under realistic gene-structure and selection scenarios to investigate whether such linkage effects impinge on the ability of the McDonald-Kreitman (MK) test to infer the rate of positive selection (\alpha) from polymorphism and divergence data. We find that in the presence of slightly deleterious mutations, MK estimates of \alpha\ severely underestimate the true rate of adaptation even if all polymorphisms with population frequencies under 50% are excluded. Furthermore, already under intermediate rates of adaptation, genetic draft substantially distorts the site frequency spectra at neutral and functional sites from the expectations under mutation-selection-drift balance. MK-type approaches that first…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
