Embedding Groups into Distributive Subsets of the Monoid of Binary Operations
Gregory T. Mezera

TL;DR
This paper explores how groups can be embedded into the set of binary operations on a set, focusing on distributive subsets and minimal embedding sizes, revealing that any group can be embedded into Bin(X) for X=G.
Contribution
It demonstrates that any group can be embedded into Bin(X) with X set to the group itself, and analyzes the minimal size of sets needed for non-abelian subgroup embeddings.
Findings
Any group can be embedded in Bin(X) for X=G.
Six-element set is minimal for non-abelian subgroup embedding.
Identifies the first noncommutative subgroup in Bin(X).
Abstract
Let X be a set and Bin(X) the set of all binary operations on X. We say that a subset of Bin(X) is a distributive set of operations if all pairs of elements are right distributive. J.Przytycki posed the question of which groups can be realized as distributive sets. The initial guess that any group may be embedded into Bin(X) for some X was complicated by an observation that if a binary operation is idempotent (a*a=a), then it commutes with every element of S. The first noncommutative subgroup of Bin(X), the symmetric group on three elements, was found in October of 2011 by Y.Berman. We show that any group can be embedded in Bin(X) for X=G (as a set). We also discuss minimality of embeddings observing that, in particular, X with six elements is the smallest set such that Bin(X) contains a non-abelian subgroup.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHermeneutics and Narrative Identity · Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues · Health, Medicine and Society
