Forbidden Configurations: Finding the number predicted by the Anstee-Sali Conjecture is NP-hard
Miguel Raggi

TL;DR
This paper proves that determining the asymptotic number of edges in hypergraphs avoiding a fixed subhypergraph, as predicted by the Anstee-Sali conjecture, is an NP-hard problem, highlighting computational complexity challenges.
Contribution
It establishes the NP-hardness of computing the asymptotic behaviour of forb(m,F), assuming the Anstee-Sali conjecture, which was previously unproven.
Findings
Proves NP-hardness of finding asymptotics of forb(m,F)
Links conjecture validity to computational complexity
Highlights difficulty in hypergraph extremal problems
Abstract
Let F be a hypergraph and let forb(m,F) denote the maximum number of edges a hypergraph with m vertices can have if it doesn't contain F as a subhypergraph. A conjecture of Anstee and Sali predicts the asymptotic behaviour of forb(m,F) for fixed F. In this paper we prove that even finding this predicted asymptotic behaviour is an NP-hard problem, meaning that if the Anstee-Sali conjecture were true, finding the asymptotics of forb(m,F) would be NP-hard.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLimits and Structures in Graph Theory · Advanced Graph Theory Research · Graph Labeling and Dimension Problems
