CFHTLenS: The Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope Lensing Survey - Imaging Data and Catalogue Products
T. Erben, H. Hildebrandt, L. Miller, L. van Waerbeke, C. Heymans, H., Hoekstra, T. D. Kitching, Y. Mellier, J. Benjamin, C. Blake, C. Bonnett, O., Cordes, J. Coupon, L. Fu, R. Gavazzi, B. Gillis, E. Grocutt, S. D. J. Gwyn,, K. Holhjem, M. J. Hudson, M. Kilbinger, K. Kuijken

TL;DR
This paper details the processing and release of high-quality imaging data and catalogs from the CFHTLenS survey, enabling advanced weak lensing research with precise calibration and extensive data products.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive data set, processing methodology, and calibration details for the CFHTLenS imaging survey, facilitating weak lensing studies.
Findings
Achieved high astrometric accuracy of 30-70 mas.
Photometric calibration dispersion of 0.01-0.04 mag.
Released extensive data products including images and catalogs.
Abstract
We present data products from the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope Lensing Survey (CFHTLenS). CFHTLenS is based on the Wide component of the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope Legacy Survey (CFHTLS). It encompasses 154 deg^2 of deep, optical, high-quality, sub-arcsecond imaging data in the five optical filters u^*g'r'i'z'. The article presents our data processing of the complete CFHTLenS data set. We were able to obtain a data set with very good image quality and high-quality astrometric and photometric calibration. Our external astrometric accuracy is between 60-70 mas with respect to SDSS data and the internal alignment in all filters is around 30 mas. Our average photometric calibration shows a dispersion on the order of 0.01 to 0.03 mag for g'r'i'z' and about 0.04 mag for u^* with respect to SDSS sources down to i <= 21. In the spirit of the CFHTLS all our data products are released to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
