Review of double beta experiments
Xavier Sarazin

TL;DR
This review comprehensively covers various experimental techniques for double beta decay detection, discussing backgrounds, advantages, limitations, and recent progress, especially highlighting scintillating bolometers and large liquid scintillator detectors.
Contribution
It provides a detailed comparison of double beta decay experimental methods, including recent advancements and specific focus on scintillating bolometers and liquid scintillator detectors.
Findings
Analysis of background sources and reduction strategies.
Comparison of different detection techniques.
Highlighting progress in scintillating bolometers.
Abstract
This paper is the first part of the manuscript written in April 2012 for my academic Accreditation to supervise research. It offers a review of the double beta experimental techniques. My purpose is to detail, for each technique, the different origins of background, how they can be identified, and how they can be reduced. Advantages and limitations are discussed. This review is organized as follows. First, the question of the possible Majorana nature for the neutrino is presented and the physic of neutrinoless double beta decay is summarized. Then I begin by presenting the tracko-calo NEMO-3 and SuperNEMO experiments. I've worked on these two experiments since 15 years. So it was natural to start with them with a relatively more exhaustive description. I will then present the germanium technique. I will then review the bolometer technique. I will describe in detail the recent progress…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNeutrino Physics Research · Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena · Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
