Application of FCI at engineering students in Bogota: an interpretation of the answers through a random model of two levels
Paco Talero, Orlando Organista, Luis Barbosa

TL;DR
This study applied the FCI to Bogota engineering students, revealing a two-level random pattern in their answers and a lack of clear mental models about physics.
Contribution
It introduces a two-level random model to interpret FCI responses and highlights students' misconceptions early in physics education.
Findings
Answer distribution follows a two-level random pattern.
Students lack clear mental models of physical phenomena.
The model helps interpret students' misconceptions.
Abstract
We applied the FCI to 646 engineering students from Bogota when they began your first year physics, we found that the relative frequency of the number of correct answers has a random pattern of two levels, also we found that they don't have clear mental models about physical world.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEducational methodologies and cognitive development · Knowledge Societies in the 21st Century · Violence, Education, and Gender Studies
