Evidence for a Photospheric Component in the Prompt Emission of the Short GRB120323A and its Effects on the GRB Hardness-Luminosity Relation
S. Guiriec (1, 2), F. Daigne, R. Hasco\"et, G. Vianello, R., Mochkovitch, F. Ryde, C. Kouveliotou, S. Xiong, P.N. Bhat, S. Foley, D., Gr\"uber, J. M. Burgess, S. McGlynn, J. McEnery, N. Gehrels ((1) NASA Goddard, Space Flight Center, (2) NPP)

TL;DR
This paper presents evidence that a photospheric thermal component significantly influences the prompt emission of short GRB 120323A, affecting its spectral properties and the hardness-luminosity relation, with implications for GRB models and cosmology.
Contribution
It demonstrates the presence of a photospheric component in a short GRB and introduces a universal hardness-luminosity relation for GRBs, aiding in redshift estimation.
Findings
Two-component spectral model fits better than single-component.
Photospheric emission influences spectral parameters and correlations.
A universal hardness-luminosity relation is proposed for GRBs.
Abstract
The short GRB 120323A had the highest flux ever detected with the Fermi/GBM. Here we study its remarkable spectral properties and their evolution using two spectral models: (i) a single emission component scenario, where the spectrum is modeled by the empirical Band function, and (ii) a two component scenario, where thermal (Planck-like) emission is observed simultaneously with a non-thermal component (a Band function). We find that the latter model fits the integrated burst spectrum significantly better than the former, and that their respective spectral parameters are dramatically different: when fit with a Band function only, the Epeak of the event is unusually soft for a short GRB, while adding a thermal component leads to more typical short GRB values. Our time-resolved spectral analysis produces similar results. We argue here that the two-component model is the preferred…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
