Comparing H-alpha and HI Surveys as Means to a Complete Local Galaxy Catalog in the Advanced LIGO/Virgo Era
Brian D. Metzger, David L. Kaplan, Edo Berger

TL;DR
This paper compares H-alpha and HI surveys to improve local galaxy catalogs, aiding electromagnetic follow-up of gravitational wave sources by increasing catalog completeness within 200 Mpc.
Contribution
It evaluates the effectiveness of H-alpha and HI surveys in achieving galaxy catalog completeness for GW counterpart identification, highlighting their respective advantages and limitations.
Findings
H-alpha survey could reach ~75% SFR completeness but only ~33% stellar mass.
HI survey could achieve ~80% SFR and ~50% stellar mass completeness.
Both surveys can identify over 50% of host galaxies for short gamma-ray bursts.
Abstract
Identifying the electromagnetic counterparts of gravitational wave (GW) sources detected by upcoming networks of advanced ground-based interferometers will be challenging due in part to the large number of unrelated astrophysical transients within the ~10-100 square degree sky localizations. A potential way to greatly reduce the number of such false positives is to limit detailed follow-up to only those candidates near galaxies within the GW sensitivity range of ~200 Mpc for binary neutron star mergers. Such a strategy is currently hindered by the fact that galaxy catalogs are grossly incomplete within this volume. Here we compare two methods for completing the local galaxy catalog: (1) a narrow-band H-alpha imaging survey; and (2) an HI emission line radio survey. Using H-alpha fluxes, stellar masses (M_star), and star formation rates (SFR) from galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
