Comment on: Evaluating causal relations in neural systems: Granger causality, directed transfer function and statistical assessment of significance
Michael Eichler

TL;DR
This paper critically examines claims linking the directed transfer function (DTF) to Granger causality, demonstrating that the previously asserted relationship is incorrect and clarifying the distinction between these concepts.
Contribution
The authors refute the claimed equivalence between DTF and Granger causality, clarifying the conceptual differences and correcting misconceptions in the existing literature.
Findings
The claimed relationship between DTF and Granger causality is false.
The paper clarifies the conceptual differences between DTF and Granger causality.
It emphasizes the importance of correct statistical assessment in neural systems analysis.
Abstract
We comment on a paper by Kaminski et al. (2001) and show that their claim of a relationship between the directed transfer function (DTF) and the concept of Granger causality is false.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsControl Systems and Identification · Neural Networks and Applications · Blind Source Separation Techniques
