Beam energy and centrality dependence of the statistical moments of the net-charge and net-kaon multiplicity distributions in Au+Au collisions at STAR
Daniel McDonald (for the STAR Collaboration)

TL;DR
This study analyzes how the statistical moments of net-charge and net-kaon multiplicity distributions vary with beam energy and collision centrality in Au+Au collisions, aiming to identify signs of a critical point in nuclear matter.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed measurement of higher-order moments of net-charge and net-kaon distributions across multiple energies and centralities in heavy-ion collisions, searching for critical phenomena.
Findings
No significant divergence observed in moments suggestive of a critical point.
Results are consistent with non-critical models like Hadron Resonance Gas and Poisson statistics.
Data show energy and centrality dependence of multiplicity moments, constraining theoretical models.
Abstract
In part to search for a possible critical point (CP) in the phase diagram of hot nuclear matter, a Beam Energy Scan was performed at the Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collider at Brookhaven National Laboratory. The STAR experiment collected significant Au+Au data sets at beam energies, , of 7.7, 11.5, 19.6, 27, 39, 62.4, and 200 GeV. Lattice and phenomenological calculations suggest that the presence of a CP might result in divergences of the thermodynamic susceptibilities and correlation length. The statistical moments of the multiplicity distributions of particles reflecting conserved quantities, such as net-charge and net-strangeness, are expected to depend sensitively on these correlation lengths, making them attractive tools in the search for a possible critical point. The centrality and beam-energy dependence of the statistical moments of the net-charge…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
