Process verification of two-qubit quantum gates by randomized benchmarking
A. D. C\'orcoles, Jay M. Gambetta, Jerry M. Chow, John A. Smolin,, Matthew Ware, J. D. Strand, B. L. T. Plourde, M. Steffen

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates a complete randomized benchmarking protocol on two superconducting qubits, achieving precise error estimates for two-qubit gates, which are crucial for quantum computing fidelity improvements.
Contribution
It introduces an improved two-qubit gate implementation and applies a comprehensive randomized benchmarking protocol to accurately assess gate errors.
Findings
Optimal average error per Clifford: 0.0936
Two-qubit gate error from interleaved benchmarking: 0.0653
Quantum process tomography error estimate: ~0.12
Abstract
We implement a complete randomized benchmarking protocol on a system of two superconducting qubits. The protocol consists of randomizing over gates in the Clifford group, which experimentally are generated via an improved two-qubit cross-resonance gate implementation and single-qubit unitaries. From this we extract an optimal average error per Clifford of 0.0936. We also perform an interleaved experiment, alternating our optimal two-qubit gate with random two-qubit Clifford gates, to obtain a two-qubit gate error of 0.0653. We compare these values with a two-qubit gate error of ~0.12 obtained from quantum process tomography, which is likely limited by state preparation and measurement errors.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
