Is the firewall consistent?: Gedanken experiments on black hole complementarity and firewall proposal
Dong-il Hwang, Bum-Hoon Lee, Dong-han Yeom

TL;DR
This paper examines the theoretical consistency of firewalls in black hole physics, questioning their placement and impact on classical and quantum theories, and introduces a model with disconnected horizons to explore these issues.
Contribution
It proposes a gravitational collapse model with a false vacuum lump to analyze firewall placement and its effects on black hole complementarity and spacetime structure.
Findings
Firewall can exist outside the event horizon without apparent horizon
Firewall modifies both general relativity and semi-classical quantum field theory
Disconnected apparent horizons can occur in certain collapse scenarios
Abstract
In this paper, we discuss the black hole complementarity and the firewall proposal at length. Black hole complementarity is inevitable if we assume the following five things: unitarity, entropy-area formula, existence of an information observer, semi-classical quantum field theory for an asymptotic observer, and the general relativity for an in-falling observer. However, large N rescaling and the AMPS argument show that black hole complementarity is inconsistent. To salvage the basic philosophy of the black hole complementarity, AMPS introduced a firewall around the horizon. According to large N rescaling, the firewall should be located close to the apparent horizon. We investigate the consistency of the firewall with the two critical conditions: the firewall should be near the time-like apparent horizon and it should not affect the future infinity. Concerning this, we have introduced a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
