Extended object reconstruction in adaptive-optics imaging: the multiresolution approach

TL;DR

This paper explores multiresolution transforms like wavelets and curvelets for reconstructing extended objects in adaptive optics imaging, demonstrating that static PSF deconvolution can outperform blind and myopic methods in certain conditions.

Contribution

It introduces a multiresolution approach using wavelets and curvelets for AO image reconstruction and compares its effectiveness against traditional blind and myopic deconvolution methods.

Findings

Curvelets outperform wavelets in reconstruction quality.

Static PSF deconvolution can surpass blind and myopic approaches.

Multichannel deconvolution with static PSF yields better results in tested scenarios.

Abstract

We propose the application of multiresolution transforms, such as wavelets (WT) and curvelets (CT), to the reconstruction of images of extended objects that have been acquired with adaptive optics (AO) systems. Such multichannel approaches normally make use of probabilistic tools in order to distinguish significant structures from noise and reconstruction residuals. Furthermore, we aim to check the historical assumption that image-reconstruction algorithms using static PSFs are not suitable for AO imaging. We convolve an image of Saturn taken with the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) with AO PSFs from the 5-m Hale telescope at the Palomar Observatory and add both shot and readout noise. Subsequently, we apply different approaches to the blurred and noisy data in order to recover the original object. The approaches include multi-frame blind deconvolution (with the algorithm IDAC), myopic deconvolution with regularization (with MISTRAL) and wavelets- or curvelets-based static PSF deconvolution (AWMLE and ACMLE algorithms). We used the mean squared error (MSE) and the structural similarity index (SSIM) to compare the results. We discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the two metrics. We found that CT produces better results than WT, as measured in terms of MSE and SSIM. Multichannel deconvolution with a static PSF produces results which are generally better than the results obtained with the myopic/blind approaches (for the images we tested) thus showing that the ability of a method to suppress the noise and to track the underlying iterative process is just as critical as the capability of the myopic/blind approaches to update the PSF.