Comparing linear ion-temperature-gradient-driven mode stability of the National Compact Stellarator Experiment and a shaped tokamak
J. A. Baumgaertel, G. W. Hammett, D. R. Mikkelsen

TL;DR
This study compares the linear stability of ion-temperature-gradient-driven modes in the NCSX stellarator and a shaped tokamak using gyrokinetic simulations, revealing that NCSX's stellarator configuration offers competitive or superior critical gradients.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed comparison of ITG mode stability between NCSX and a shaped tokamak, highlighting stabilizing effects unique to stellarator geometry.
Findings
NCSX has competitive or better normalized critical gradients than the tokamak.
For kinetic ITG modes, NCSX shows higher critical gradients and lower growth rates up to a certain threshold.
NCSX's stellarator configuration offsets the destabilizing effects of narrow cross sections.
Abstract
One metric for comparing confinement properties of different magnetic fusion energy configurations is the linear critical gradient of drift wave modes. The critical gradient scale length determines the ratio of the core to pedestal temperature when a plasma is limited to marginal stability in the plasma core. The gyrokinetic turbulence code GS2 was used to calculate critical temperature gradients for the linear, collisionless ion temperature gradient (ITG) mode in the National Compact Stellarator Experiment (NCSX) and a prototypical shaped tokamak, based on the profiles of a JET H-mode shot and the stronger shaping of ARIES-AT. While a concern was that the narrow cross section of NCSX at some toroidal locations would result in steep gradients that drive instabilities more easily, it is found that other stabilizing effects of the stellarator configuration offset this so that the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
