Geometric versus non-geometric rough paths
Martin Hairer, David Kelly

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that non-geometric rough paths can be represented as geometric rough paths, allowing rough differential equations driven by non-geometric paths to be reformulated as geometric ones, extending classical correction formulas.
Contribution
It introduces a method to encode non-geometric branched rough paths as geometric rough paths, enabling the rewriting of associated RDEs in a geometric framework.
Findings
Non-geometric rough paths can be equivalently defined as paths in a Lie group.
Every branched rough path can be encoded into a geometric rough path.
RDEs driven by non-geometric rough paths can be reformulated as geometric RDEs.
Abstract
In this article we consider rough differential equations (RDEs) driven by non-geometric rough paths, using the concept of branched rough paths introduced in Gubinelli (2004). We first show that branched rough paths can equivalently be defined as -H\"older continuous paths in some Lie group, akin to geometric rough paths. We then show that every branched rough path can be encoded in a geometric rough path. More precisely, for every branched rough path lying above a path , there exists a geometric rough path lying above an extended path , such that contains all the information of . As a corollary of this result, we show that every RDE driven by a non-geometric rough path can be rewritten as an extended RDE driven by a geometric rough path . One could think of this as a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
