AGN host galaxies at redshift z~0.7: peculiar or not?
Asmus Boehm, Lutz Wisotzki, Eric F. Bell, Knud Jahnke, Christian Wolf,, David Bacon, Marco Barden, Meghan E. Gray, Goetz Hoeppe, Shardha Jogee, Dan, H. McIntosh, Chien Y. Peng, Adai R. Robaina, Michael Balogh, Fabio D., Barazza, John A. R. Caldwell, Catherine Heymans

TL;DR
This study compares the morphologies of AGN host galaxies and quiescent galaxies at z~0.7, finding that AGN hosts are generally undisturbed, suggesting major mergers are not the primary trigger for nuclear activity at this epoch.
Contribution
It introduces a method to account for optical nuclei effects in morphological analysis and provides evidence against major mergers being the main AGN trigger at z~0.7.
Findings
AGN hosts are morphologically similar to undisturbed galaxies.
Optical nuclei significantly influence morphological parameters.
Major mergers' signatures are likely undetectable in typical HST images at this epoch.
Abstract
We perform a quantitative morphological comparison between the hosts of Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN) and quiescent galaxies at intermediate redshifts (z~0.7). The imaging data are taken from the large HST/ACS mosaics of the GEMS and STAGES surveys. Our main aim is to test whether nuclear activity at this cosmic epoch is triggered by major mergers. Using images of quiescent galaxies and stars, we create synthetic AGN images to investigate the impact of an optical nucleus on the morphological analysis of AGN hosts. Galaxy morphologies are parameterized using the asymmetry index A, concentration index C, Gini coefficient G and M20 index. A sample of ~200 synthetic AGN is matched to 21 real AGN in terms of redshift, host brightness and host-to-nucleus ratio to ensure a reliable comparison between active and quiescent galaxies. The optical nuclei strongly affect the morphological parameters…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
