Weighing The Evidence For A Gravitational-Wave Background In The First International Pulsar Timing Array Data Challenge
Stephen R. Taylor, Jonathan R. Gair, L. Lentati

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the first International Pulsar Timing Array Data Challenge using Bayesian methods, detecting a gravitational-wave background consistent with supermassive black-hole binaries and evaluating the impact of data down-sampling.
Contribution
It applies a robust Bayesian framework to analyze pulsar timing data, providing evidence for gravitational-wave backgrounds and assessing data processing effects.
Findings
Favored a gravitational-wave background with specific amplitude and spectral index in datasets Closed1 and Closed2.
Detected red-timing noise and gravitational-wave background in dataset Closed3.
Confirmed the background's properties are consistent with inspiraling supermassive black-hole binaries.
Abstract
We describe an analysis of the First International Pulsar Timing Array Data Challenge. We employ a robust, unbiased Bayesian framework developed by van Haasteren to study the three Open and Closed datasets, testing various models for each dataset and using MultiNest to recover the evidence for the purposes of Bayesian model-selection. The parameter constraints of the favoured model are confirmed using an adaptive MCMC technique. Our results for Closed1 favoured a gravitational-wave background with strain amplitude at f=1 yr-1, A, of (1.1 +/- 0.1) x 10^{-14}, power spectral-index gamma=4.30 +/- 0.15 and no evidence for red-timing noise or single-sources. The evidence for Closed2 favours a gravitational-wave background with A=(6.1 +/- 0.3) x 10^{-14}, gamma=4.34 +/- 0.09 with no red-timing noise or single-sources. Finally, the evidence for Closed3 favours the presence of red-timing noise…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
