Tachyonic (phantom) power-law cosmology
Rachan Rangdee (IF Naresuan), Burin Gumjudpai (IF Naresuan)

TL;DR
This paper investigates tachyonic and quintessence scalar field-driven cosmologies with power-law and phantom power-law expansion models, constrained by WMAP7 data, and finds that phantom power-law models align better with observational data.
Contribution
It introduces a detailed analysis of tachyonic and quintessence power-law cosmologies, constraining models with observational data and reconstructing the tachyonic potential.
Findings
Power-law cosmology is excluded due to mismatch with observations.
Phantom power-law models agree with observational data for both fields.
Reconstructed tachyonic potential shows specific form and parameters.
Abstract
Tachyonic scalar field-driven late universe with dust matter content is considered. The cosmic expansion is modeled with power-law and phantom power-law expansion at late time, i.e. . WMAP7 and its combined data are used to constraint the model. The forms of potential and the field solution are different for quintessence and tachyonic cases. Power-law cosmology model (driven by either quintessence or tachyonic field) predicts unmatched equation of state parameter to the observational value, hence the power-law model is excluded for both quintessence and tachyonic field. In the opposite, the phantom power-law model predicts agreeing valued of equation of state parameter with the observational data for both quintessence and tachyonic cases, i.e. (WMAP7+BAO+) and (WMAP7). The…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
