The radio surface brightness to diameter relation for galactic supernova remnants: sample selection and robust analysis with various fitting offsets
M. Z. Pavlovic, D. Urosevic, B. Vukotic, B. Arbutina, U. D. Goker

TL;DR
This paper develops new empirical and theoretical radio surface brightness-diameter ({} - D) relations for galactic supernova remnants, using advanced fitting methods and a new calibration sample, leading to revised distance estimates and a better understanding of SNR evolution.
Contribution
It introduces a robust analysis with various fitting offsets for the {} - D relation, providing a steeper slope closer to theoretical predictions and applying it to improve SNR distance estimates.
Findings
Steeper {} - D slope ({} = 4.8) than previous studies.
Orthogonal regression is optimal for data with severe scatter.
Revised distance scale significantly alters SNR distance estimates.
Abstract
In this paper we present new empirical radio surface brightness-to-diameter ({\Sigma} - D) relations for supernova remnants (SNRs) in our Galaxy. We also present new theoretical derivations of the {\Sigma} - D relation based on equipartition or on constant ratio between cosmic rays and magnetic field energy. A new calibration sample of 60 Galactic SNRs with independently determined distances is created. Instead of (standard) vertical regression, used in previous papers, different fitting procedures are applied to the calibration sample in the log {\Sigma} - log D plane. Non-standard regressions are used to satisfy the requirement that values of parameters obtained from the fitting of {\Sigma} - D and D - {\Sigma} relations should be invariant within estimated uncertainties. We impose symmetry between {\Sigma} - D and D - {\Sigma} due to the existence of large scatter in both D and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
