Comparing several heuristics for a packing problem
Camelia-M. Pintea, Cristian Pascan, Mara Hajdu-Macelaru

TL;DR
This paper compares the effectiveness of a greedy algorithm and a hybrid genetic algorithm in solving a two-dimensional bin packing problem without item rotation, aiming to identify which approach performs better across various data sizes.
Contribution
The study provides a comparative analysis of two heuristics, a greedy algorithm and a hybrid genetic algorithm, for a specific NP-hard packing problem.
Findings
Hybrid genetic algorithm outperforms greedy in larger datasets.
Greedy algorithm is faster but less optimal.
Results vary depending on data size.
Abstract
Packing problems are in general NP-hard, even for simple cases. Since now there are no highly efficient algorithms available for solving packing problems. The two-dimensional bin packing problem is about packing all given rectangular items, into a minimum size rectangular bin, without overlapping. The restriction is that the items cannot be rotated. The current paper is comparing a greedy algorithm with a hybrid genetic algorithm in order to see which technique is better for the given problem. The algorithms are tested on different sizes data.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
