Recommendations for Monte Carlo nucleosynthesis sampling (Research Note)
Richard Longland

TL;DR
This paper evaluates different methods of sampling reaction rate probability densities for Monte Carlo nucleosynthesis, finding that simple lognormal parametrizations provide accurate and reliable abundance uncertainty estimates.
Contribution
It introduces and compares multiple sampling methods, demonstrating that simple lognormal parametrizations are sufficient for accurate Monte Carlo nucleosynthesis predictions.
Findings
Lognormal distributions accurately describe reaction rate uncertainties.
Simple parametrizations agree within a few percent with true rate samples.
Monte Carlo nucleosynthesis studies can reliably use lognormal approximations.
Abstract
Context: Recent reaction rate evaluations include reaction rate uncertainties that have been determined in a statistically meaningful manner. Furthermore, reaction rate probability density distributions have been determined and published in the form of lognormal parameters with the specific goal of pursuing Monte Carlo nucleosynthesis studies. Aims: To test and assess different methods of randomly sampling over reaction rate probability densities and to determine the most accurate method for estimating elemental abundance uncertainties. Methods: Experimental Monte Carlo reaction rates are first computed for the 22Ne+alpha, 20Ne(p,g)21Na, 25Mg(p,g)26Al, and 18F(p,alpha)15O reactions, which are used to calculate reference nucleosynthesis yields for 16 nuclei affected by nucleosynthesis in massive stars and classical novae. Five different methods of randomly sampling over these…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
