A Consistent Approach to Falsifying Lambda-CDM with Rare Galaxy Clusters
Ian Harrison, Shaun Hotchkiss

TL;DR
This paper develops a consistent statistical framework to evaluate whether observed galaxy clusters are unusually incompatible with Lambda-CDM, providing a robust method to rank their rarity across different surveys.
Contribution
It introduces three sensitive statistical measures and the concept of 'equivalent mass at redshift zero' for ranking cluster unusualness, improving upon previous overestimations.
Findings
All observed clusters are within 2-sigma of Lambda-CDM expectations.
The method is applicable to any isolated, collapsed halo.
Guidance on where to find the rarest halos in mass-redshift space.
Abstract
We consider methods with which to answer the question "is any observed galaxy cluster too unusual for Lambda-CDM?" After emphasising that many previous attempts to answer this question will overestimate the confidence level at which Lambda-CDM can be ruled out, we outline a consistent approach to these rare clusters, which allows the question to be answered. We define three statistical measures, each of which are sensitive to changes in cluster populations arising from different modifications to the cosmological model. We also use these properties to define the 'equivalent mass at redshift zero' for a cluster --- the mass of an equally unusual cluster today. This quantity is independent of the observational survey in which the cluster was found, which makes it an ideal proxy for ranking the relative unusualness of clusters detected by different surveys. These methods are then used on a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
