The insignificance of major mergers in driving star formation at z~2
S. Kaviraj, S. Cohen, R. A. Windhorst, J. Silk, R. W. O'Connell, M. A., Dopita, A. Dekel, N. P. Hathi, A. Straughn, M. Rutkowski

TL;DR
This study shows that major mergers contribute minimally to star formation at z~2, with other processes like cold accretion playing a more significant role in galaxy growth during this epoch.
Contribution
It provides a quantitative analysis of the limited role of major mergers in star formation at z~2, challenging their perceived dominance in galaxy evolution.
Findings
Major mergers account for approximately 15% of star formation at z~2.
Non-interacting late-type galaxies host the majority of star formation.
Star formation enhancement in mergers is modest, with a ratio of about 2.2:1 compared to non-interacting galaxies.
Abstract
We study the significance of major-merger-driven star formation in the early Universe, by quantifying the contribution of this process to the total star formation budget in 80 massive (M* > 10^10 MSun) galaxies at z~2. Employing visually-classified morphologies from rest-frame V-band HST imaging, we find that 55+/-14% of the star formation budget is hosted by non-interacting late-types, with 27+/-8% in major mergers and 18+/-6% in spheroids. Given that a system undergoing a major merger continues to experience star formation driven by other processes at this epoch (e.g. cold accretion, minor mergers), ~27% is an upper limit to the major-merger contribution to star formation activity at this epoch. The ratio of the average specific star formation rate in major mergers to that in the non-interacting late-types is ~2.2:1, suggesting that the enhancement of star formation due to major…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
