Turbulent Cascades and the alpha Dynamo
J B Taylor

TL;DR
This paper reviews the mean-field turbulence-driven dynamo model in laboratory experiments, arguing that the alpha-effect is too weak compared to the beta-effect to sustain a dynamo, supported by recent experimental measurements.
Contribution
It provides a critical analysis of the mean-field dynamo model in laboratory settings, highlighting the dominance of the beta-effect over the alpha-effect and supporting this with experimental data.
Findings
Alpha-effect is much less than beta-effect in experiments.
Mean field dynamo cannot be sustained under these conditions.
Recent measurements confirm the dominance of the beta-effect.
Abstract
The well known mean-field model of a turbulence driven dynamo is reviewed in relation to Laboratory experiments in which a turbulent cascade is created by a pair of large rotors. It is argued that in such experiments the alpha-effect, driving a dynamo field, will be much less than the dissipative beta-effect. Consequently a mean field dynamo cannot be sustained. This conclusion is supported by recent measurements of the alpha and beta effects in the Madison Dynamo Experiment.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSolar and Space Plasma Dynamics · Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies · Astro and Planetary Science
