Relativity Is Not About Spacetime
Edward J. Gillis

TL;DR
This paper argues that relativity is fundamentally about the observational equivalence of different spacetime descriptions in quantum theory, not about spacetime's ontological features or local causality.
Contribution
It challenges the common assumption that relativity's core is about spacetime's structure, emphasizing its role in quantum observational equivalence rather than local causality.
Findings
Relativity does not guarantee local causality.
Spacetime descriptions are observationally equivalent in quantum theory.
Relativity reflects probabilistic nature of quantum phenomena.
Abstract
Quantum measurement predictions are consistent with relativity for macroscopic observations, but there is no consensus on how to explain this consistency in fundamental terms. The prevailing assumption is that the relativistic structure of spacetime should provide the framework for any microphysical account. This bias is due, in large part, to our intuitions about local causality, the idea that all physical processes propagate through space in a continuous manner. I argue that relativity is not a guarantor of local causality, and is not about ontological features of spacetime. It is, rather, an expression of the observational equivalence of spacetime descriptions of physical processes. This observational equivalence is due to the essentially probabilistic nature of quantum theory.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Biofield Effects and Biophysics · Philosophy and History of Science
