On the distinction between the classes of Dixmier and Connes-Dixmier traces
Fedor Sukochev, Alexandr Usachev, Dmitriy Zanin

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that the classes of Dixmier and Connes-Dixmier traces are not equivalent on the Dixmier ideal, providing a specific example of an operator measurable by Connes-Dixmier but not by Dixmier.
Contribution
It constructs a Marcinkiewicz space and a positive operator that distinguishes the classes of Dixmier and Connes-Dixmier traces, showing they differ even on the Dixmier ideal.
Findings
Dixmier and Connes-Dixmier trace classes differ on the Dixmier ideal.
A specific operator is Connes-Dixmier measurable but not Dixmier measurable.
The paper provides a concrete example to distinguish the trace classes.
Abstract
In the present paper we prove that the classes of Dixmier and Connes-Dixmier traces differ even on the Dixmier ideal . We construct a Marcinkiewicz space and a positive operator which is Connes-Dixmier measurable but which is not Dixmier measurable.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Banach Space Theory · Holomorphic and Operator Theory · Advanced Operator Algebra Research
