Why does the Jeans Swindle work?
M. Falco, S. H. Hansen, R. Wojtak, G. A. Mamon

TL;DR
This paper provides a formal justification for the 'Jeans Swindle' by demonstrating that including the universe's expansion in the Jeans equation cancels the divergent background density term, legitimizing this common but unjustified approximation.
Contribution
It shows that the expansion of the universe naturally cancels the divergent background term, providing a theoretical basis for the Jeans Swindle.
Findings
The expansion term cancels the divergent background density term.
The Jeans Swindle is formally justified when including cosmic expansion.
Provides a theoretical foundation for a common astrophysical approximation.
Abstract
When measuring the mass profile of any given cosmological structure through internal kinematics, the distant background density is always ignored. This trick is often refereed to as the "Jeans Swindle". Without this trick a divergent term from the background density renders the mass profile undefined, however, this trick has no formal justification. We show that when one includes the expansion of the Universe in the Jeans equation, a term appears which exactly cancels the divergent term from the background. We thereby establish a formal justification for using the Jeans Swindle.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
