Concerning the Phase of the Time-Variation in the Cl-36 Decay Rate
Ephraim Fischbach, J. Thomas Gruenwald, Daniel Javorsek, II and, Jere H. Jenkins, Robert H. Lee, Peter A. Sturrock

TL;DR
This paper explains conflicting observations of Cl-36 decay rate variations as effects of solar variability, emphasizing that these are not due to measurement errors but related to solar phenomena beyond simple Earth-Sun distance models.
Contribution
It demonstrates that solar variability influences decay rate measurements, providing a new understanding of the observed discrepancies in Cl-36 decay data.
Findings
Solar variability affects Cl-36 decay rates
Conflicting results are explained by solar effects, not instrumental errors
Decay rate variations correlate with solar activity patterns
Abstract
We show that apparently conflicting results on the time-variation of the measured Cl-36 decay rates can be readily understood as arising from solar variability beyond the simple Earth-Sun distance model, and hence are not an indication of instrumental effects.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
