Practical intractability: a critique of the hypercomputation movement
Aran Nayebi

TL;DR
This paper critiques the hypercomputation movement by demonstrating its physical infeasibility and advocates for extending classical computation to address modern intractability and cyber-physical system challenges.
Contribution
It provides a mathematical and physical critique of hypercomputers and proposes a more plausible, physically realizable extension to classical computation focusing on intractability.
Findings
Hypercomputers are physically infeasible due to fundamental impossibilities.
A new extension to classical computation is proposed, focusing on intractability.
Modern computational problems in cyber-physical systems require this new paradigm.
Abstract
For over a decade, the hypercomputation movement has produced computational models that in theory solve the algorithmically unsolvable, but they are not physically realizable according to currently accepted physical theories. While opponents to the hypercomputation movement provide arguments against the physical realizability of specific models in order to demonstrate this, these arguments lack the generality to be a satisfactory justification against the construction of \emph{any} information-processing machine that computes beyond the universal Turing machine. To this end, I present a more mathematically concrete challenge to hypercomputability, and will show that one is immediately led into physical impossibilities, thereby demonstrating the infeasibility of hypercomputers more generally. This gives impetus to propose and justify a more plausible starting point for an extension to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
