Relative entropy and squashed entanglement
Ke Li, Andreas Winter

TL;DR
This paper investigates properties and relationships of entanglement measures, especially squashed entanglement and relative entropy of entanglement, providing new bounds, inequalities, and evaluations that enhance understanding of quantum entanglement quantification.
Contribution
It introduces a monogamy-like inequality involving relative entropy of entanglement, establishes a stronger lower bound for squashed entanglement, and evaluates entanglement measures under restricted measurement classes.
Findings
Established a monogamy-like inequality for relative entropy of entanglement.
Derived a stronger lower bound for squashed entanglement using one-way LOCC relative entropy.
Exact evaluation of entanglement measures for maximally entangled states and their regularized versions.
Abstract
We are interested in the properties and relations of entanglement measures. Especially, we focus on the squashed entanglement and relative entropy of entanglement, as well as their analogues and variants. Our first result is a monogamy-like inequality involving the relative entropy of entanglement and its one-way LOCC variant. The proof is accomplished by exploring the properties of relative entropy in the context of hypothesis testing via one-way LOCC operations, and by making use of an argument resembling that by Piani on the faithfulness of regularized relative entropy of entanglement. Following this, we obtain a commensurate and faithful lower bound for squashed entanglement, in the form of one-way LOCC relative entropy of entanglement. This gives a strengthening to the strong subadditivity of von Neumann entropy. Our result improves the trace-distance-type bound derived in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
