Spectral Energy Distributions of Type 1 AGN in XMM-COSMOS Survey II - Shape Evolution
Heng Hao, Martin Elvis, Francesca Civano, Gianni Zamorani, Luis C. Ho,, Andrea Comastri, Marcella Brusa, Angela Bongiorno, Andrea Merloni, Jonathan, R. Trump, Mara Salvato, Chris D. Impey, Anton M. Koekemoer, Giorgio Lanzuisi,, Annalisa Celotti, Knud Jahnke, Cristian Vignali

TL;DR
This study analyzes the spectral energy distributions of 407 X-ray-selected type 1 AGN in the COSMOS survey, finding no significant evolution or dependence on key parameters, and comparing them with classical SED templates.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of SED shape evolution in a large AGN sample, revealing stability across various physical properties and expanding understanding of AGN emission characteristics.
Findings
No significant SED shape evolution with redshift, luminosity, black hole mass, or Eddington ratio.
SED dispersion is larger than in previous templates, possibly due to selection effects.
SED shapes are consistent with classical templates across the studied parameters.
Abstract
The mid-infrared to ultraviolet (0.1 -- 10 ) spectral energy distribution (SED) shapes of 407 X-ray-selected radio-quiet type 1 AGN in the wide-field ``Cosmic Evolution Survey" (COSMOS) have been studied for signs of evolution. For a sub-sample of 200 radio-quiet quasars with black hole mass estimates and host galaxy corrections, we studied their mean SEDs as a function of a broad range of redshift, bolometric luminosity, black hole mass and Eddington ratio, and compared them with the Elvis et al. (1994, E94) type 1 AGN mean SED. We found that the mean SEDs in each bin are closely similar to each other, showing no statistical significant evidence of dependence on any of the analyzed parameters. We also measured the SED dispersion as a function of these four parameters, and found no significant dependencies. The dispersion of the XMM-COSMOS SEDs is generally larger than E94 SED…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
