Psychophysical Responses Comparison in Spatial Visual, Audiovisual, and Auditory BCI-Spelling Paradigms
Moonjeong Chang, Nozomu Nishikawa, Zhenyu Cai, Shoji Makino, and, Tomasz M. Rutkowski

TL;DR
This study compares psychophysical and EEG responses across visual, audiovisual, and auditory BCI spelling paradigms, showing auditory-only BCI performance comparable to visual and audiovisual methods.
Contribution
It provides preliminary evidence that auditory-only BCI can match visual and audiovisual BCI performance, expanding options for BCI speller paradigms.
Findings
Auditory BCI performs as well as visual and audiovisual BCI.
Psychophysical response variability is evaluated.
Preliminary EEG results support auditory BCI viability.
Abstract
The paper presents a pilot study conducted with spatial visual, audiovisual and auditory brain-computer-interface (BCI) based speller paradigms. The psychophysical experiments are conducted with healthy subjects in order to evaluate a difficulty and a possible response accuracy variability. We also present preliminary EEG results in offline BCI mode. The obtained results validate a thesis, that spatial auditory only paradigm performs as good as the traditional visual and audiovisual speller BCI tasks.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces · Neural dynamics and brain function · Tactile and Sensory Interactions
